Portrait of the author as an Old Rogue

Home
Subscribe to Stuff from Sigfrid LundbergSubscribe to my stuff
Subscribe to Stuff from Sigfrid LundbergSubscribe to discussion feed

stuff by category || year

NB

My name is Sigfrid Lundberg. The stuff I publish here may, or may not, be of interest for anyone else. Most of the it is related to my profession as an Internet programmer and system developer within the area digital libraries at the Royal Library, Copenhagen (Denmark) and, before that, Lund university (Sweden).

The content here does not reflect the views of my past or present employers

Creative Commons License
This entry (Skirmishes along the boarder of the PC) within Sigfrid Lundberg's Stuff, by Sigfrid Lundberg is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Skirmishes along the boarder of the PC

Sigfrid Lundberg's Stuff 2010-06-15

Bookmark and Share

Tablets, eReaders, Smartbooks: You Name the Device and It’s News at Computex writes Katie Morgan of Advanced Risc Machines (ARM). You may not know about it, but just as Intel rules the desktop, the British chip design company's ARM Architecture rules the pockets.

According to Wikipedia, 90%+ of all embedded devices and an even higher proportion of mobile devices are designed around the ARM Architecture. There's.a fair chance that both your phone, your wireless router and your fridge are all ARM systems.

Most new gadgets appear first at Computex, and most of them are based on the ARM architecture.

The chip territories

The mobiles and the tablets are currently given prominent positions in the news feeds, and as I write this entry one of them is more often than not top news item in Google News' Sci/Tech section. It is usually about Apple's iPhone or iPad, both of which, by the way, like the Android systems, are ARM.

Intel has tried to establish itself in this area, but have not been able to get an increased market share by winning customers from ARM. The tablet is a new market segment, and the race has started to gain control over this as yet unchartered land. The chip Intel tries to market is the Atom processor which, of course, is x86. See, for instence: ARM and Intel's new battleground: the living room

Software frontiers

At basic academic levels there's differences. Frontiers. Different academic traditions expressing themselves in people's pockets.

For those who don't know the history of the Unixes, it is well worth to know that Linux is a reverse engineered variant of the AT&T System V Unix originally by Linus Torvalds who at the time lived in Helsinki. There is also a free Unix coming from the Berkeley Software Distribution BSD Unix. BSD and Linux come with very different open source licenses.

Google's Android and Chromium are both Linux platforms (hence Helsinki and Stanford Universities), whereas iPhone OS is a redecorated Berkeley Unix with a Mach kernel. Yes, it is a Mach kernel, Mack as in the speed of sound, not Mac as in Macintosh. These gadgets are somehow affiliated to University of California and Carnegie Mellon University. It shouldn't surprice you that Steve Wozniak got his training in computer science and electric engineering at Berkeley.

Whenever there are conflicts, people form alliances, sometimes new and entirely unexpected:

Anyone perceiving a pattern? There are many companies out there that right now who see opportunities for innovation and business. Quite a few of them would very much like to see one or more of the actors Google, Apple and Microsoft dwindle. Furthermore, there are some that wouldn't mind a bit less influence of either Intel or AMD.

The PC and the Tablet

I read and write mail, manage my calendars, surf and do some of my wordprocessing with my tablet. That is, I want a hand-held gadget which enables me to be creative anywhere anytime. This is pin-points one of questions most important questions: Why do we buy gadgets for computing in the first place?

The vendors have obviously radically different views on the future of computing. Recently Steve Jobs claimed that the PC as we know it is like an old truck and that the future belongs to the tablets. Steve Ballmer participated in the same conference and disputed these claims. He seemed to be convinced that the desktop PC will continue to be the workstation for a foreseeable future. Read more about what the blogosphere is saying about D

The PC as we know it will continue to morph, he said. The real question is what are you going to push. In Microsoft’s case, the answer is more installations of Windows. To a man with a hammer everything looks like a nail; we have a hammer, Mr. Ballmer joked. The problem is, it isn't funny.

blog comments powered by Disqus